Chuck Norris AT Fact of the Day
Antitrust agencies can eliminate all consumer harm. Except those inflicted by Chuck Norris.
Chillin'Competition
Relaxing whilst doing Competition Law is not an Oxymoron
Authors’ Official (and unofficial) Bios
Events and publications
Blog Stats
- 3,173,173 hits
Recent Comments
 | Tero on What Lukoil means for the refu… |
 | Emanuela Lecchi on Upcoming events: Luxembourg (L… |
 | Dolapo Popoola on Ranking the rankings |
 | Pablo Ibanez Colomo on What Lukoil means for the refu… |
 | Luc Peeperkorn on What Lukoil means for the refu… |
Competition Tweets
Tweets by LamadridAlfonsoBrussels School of Competition
Join 3,843 other subscribers
Categories
- Antitrust Scholarship
- Archive
- Breaking – Antitrust – News
- Case-Law
- China Watch
- Events
- Everything Competition Lawyers should know about State Aids
- Guest bloggers
- Interesting Links
- International Antitrust
- Jokes
- Life at Law Firms
- Life at University
- Our Organizations
- Our Publications
- Polls and quizzes
- The Economist Corner
- The Friday Slot
- Uncategorized
Blogroll
- Antitrust and Competition Policy Blog
- Antitrust Commentary
- Antitrust Review
- Australian Competition Law
- CCP Blog
- Competition Law Blog
- Competition Law: a view from Hungary
- Energy Policy Blog
- Facebook – Become Fan of LLM in Competition and IP Law
- Global Competition Law Centre (GCLC)
- Global Competition Policy (GCP)
- Institute for European Legal Studies
- Institute of Competition Law (Concurrences)
- IP and Competition Law Blog (Canada)
- Kartellblog (German)
- La Libre Competencia
- Performance Juridique
- SSRN
- The European Telecommunications Law Blog
- The IPKat
- Truth on the market
- V. Selinsky's blog (French)
Archives
Visitors Location
Chillin'Competition 
Wouldn’t flipping it around be better: There is not enough market power to inflict consumer harm on Chuck Norris.? I wouldn’t be so confident in competition authorities.
F
1 August 2012 at 8:07 pm