Chillin'Competition

Relaxing whilst doing Competition Law is not an Oxymoron

Hotch Potch

with one comment

20140708_172412

As you might have noticed, we took an unnanounced temporary break from bloggin’. First it was due to a particularly intense period of work (I might give more details about it in the future) and then to (my only…) week of Summer holidays during which I wanted to hear nothing about competition law [btw, I read these two very recommendable books (here and here), only to find out that the latter -a dystopian novel about tech companies- does refer to European Commission’s antitrust investigations as part of the plot…].

In between this break Chillin’Competition surpassed 750,000 visits  [I checked the stats and only in the past year we’ve had visits from 193 countries (exactly the same as the members of the UN)], which still today feels pretty surprising. We are however increasingly struggling to find the time to improve what we do here; at least in my case, this is proving a challenge (and it’ll be even more in the near future once the upcoming paternity reshuffles my priorities). This is to say that you should expect some significant changes in Chillin’Competition after the summer holidays, hopefully for good.We’ll explain this in more detail soon.

Nicolas -who will soon end his time at DG Comp- and myself discussed a bit about this yesterday when we met by surprise at a corridor of the College of Europe in Bruges; we were simultaneously lecturing in two contiguous rooms and hadn’t realized about it… By the way, I was lecturing to a group of very smart Chinese officials (pictured above) about EU Competition Procedure and Article 106 TFEU (the provision with the greatest unexploited potential in EU Competition Law) and very much enjoyed discussing with them (this in spite of -excellent- consecutive translation, which added a level of complexity to the conversation). In case anyone is interested, here are the two power points I used (although I’m afraid you might have trouble understanding much): EU Competition procedure (CoE-China) and Article 106 (CoE-China)  (many thanks, by the way, to Carlos Bobillo and Ana Balcells for taking care of these. One day they’ll realize that the main advantage of spending a few years at a law firm is that you can get someone to do your PowerPoints 😉 )

 

 

 

Written by Alfonso Lamadrid

9 July 2014 at 2:58 pm

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. About “the provision with the greatest unexploited potential in EU Competition Law”: the Court has just ruled on the appeal of the Greek lignite case annulling the GC’s judgment. Link to the judgment: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=155109&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=72863

    This deserves at least another Ménage à trois to see how much of that unexploited potential has been unveiled!

    Carlos Arrebola

    17 July 2014 at 10:41 am


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.