Chillin'Competition

Relaxing whilst doing Competition Law is not an Oxymoron

Archive for June 8th, 2010

I attach below the slides presented at the GCLC lunch talk yesterday, and paste hereafter info on forthcoming GCLC events:

48^th lunch talk – 7 July – First Settlement Decision in the DRAMs Case, with K. Dekeyser, P. Mansfield and R. Snellders

49^th lunch talk – 23 September – Quantification of Damages with Judge P. Roth and A. Lofaro

Written by Nicolas Petit

8 June 2010 at 1:06 pm

RT @randypicker: Interesting long thread from Josh on Qualcomm. Worth reading. And he did break away from shark week after all, so, you kno… 1 day ago
RT @randypicker: Longish thread on CA9 Qualcomm opinion. I think that I agree with the CA9’s big picture analysis, though I find the discus… 1 day ago
RT @ReutersLegal: U.S. appeals court reverses antitrust ruling against Qualcomm reut.rs/2DFU6BW https://t.co/m5yQ8nv6cs 2 days ago
The legal test and the remedy are not two separate steps; they are two sides of the same coin chillingcompetition.com/2020/08/11/the… 2 days ago
RT @BruceMcF: @BabyAlpaca4 @toomuchnick It seems like a computer-ghost version of a Catch-22, where the computerized system says there are… 3 days ago

	Becket McGrath on Is it an abuse for Apple to em…
	Pablo Ibanez Colomo on The legal test and the remedy…
	Pablo Ibanez Colomo on On Case C-165/19 P, Slovak Tel…
	Niamh on The legal test and the remedy…
	ChiChiTo on On Case C-165/19 P, Slovak Tel…