Chillin'Competition

Relaxing whilst doing Competition Law is not an Oxymoron

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

2.0

leave a comment »

Derecho de la competencia has upgraded. see http://lalibrecompetencia.com/

New design, new name and more contributors from different jurisdictions of Latin America:

In addition to Juan David, Ignacio de León (Venezuela, Queen Mary U. of London),Pablo Márquez (Colombia, Harvard U.and U. of Oxford), Victor Pavón Villamayor (México, U. of Oxford), Javier Tapia (Chile, U. College of London), Leopoldo Ubiratan (Brazil, LSE and U. of Sao Paulo) and Natalia Barrera (Colombia, U. Javeriana), have joined the venture.

If I understand well the blog puports to create a news and discussion platform for people interested in Latin American Competition Policy, Law and Economics. A warm welcome to the new contributors, and congrats to Juan David!

Written by Nicolas Petit

10 February 2010 at 11:31 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Revelation

leave a comment »

The brilliant, prolific, US judge and scholar Richard Posner recently had a revelation.  See here. Not a philosophical U-turn, but close.

Found on D. Gutierez’s blog.

(Image possibly subject to copyrights: source here)

Written by Nicolas Petit

29 January 2010 at 4:17 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Dissertation Summaries (15) – LLM in IP and Competition Law 2009-2010

leave a comment »

European Competition Policy and the Lisbon Treaty: Dawn of a new era or business as usual?– Patrick Vincent (P.Vincent@student.ulg.ac.be)

In the post-Lisbon Treaty era, the reference to “free and undistorted competition” previously enshrined in Article 3(g) EC has disappeared from the forefront of the EU treaties. The present dissertation seeks to assess whether the elimination of this provision – and its replacement by a Protocol appended to the Treaty – is likely to affect the effectiveness of European competition policy. Whilst scholars are divided on this issue, there nonetheless seems to be a growing concern that European competition policy might as a result be increasingly influenced by external, public-policy, considerations, which to date have played a marginal role in the Commission’s orthodox enforcement policy. To test the veracity of this proposition, the present dissertation will review a number of concrete practical issues (environmental agreements, etc.), where considerations alien to core competition concerns might be invoked by stakeholders.

Written by Nicolas Petit

26 January 2010 at 2:12 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Bad Legal Advice and the “Shaming” of Colleagues with Poor Performance

with one comment

Prof W. Simon (Stanford Law School) has a controversial, amusing, piece on academics providing legal advice. In essence, Simon argues that the incentives’ structure and informational opacity surrounding academics’ advisory work leads to “bad legal advice“. In his paper, Simon seeks to provide empirical evidence of this. To this end, he actually trashes three US colleagues, who allegedly delivered bad advice in a case he was involved in.

To correct this market failure, Simon suggest a remedy consisting in increasing transparency and publicly “shaming” colleagues (disclosing their names) with poor performance. Prof. Green (Fordham University)wrote a strong rebuttal.

I paste hereafter Simon’s conclusion.

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Nicolas Petit

25 January 2010 at 11:02 am

Posted in Uncategorized

My Slides – IEB/Universidad Complutense Programme – Madrid

leave a comment »

I attach the slides I presented in Madrid. The first set of slides is an introduction to EU competition law. The second set of slides deals with the concepts of agreements, concerted practices and decisions of associations of undertakings.

General introduction – xiii_curso_de_derecho_de_la_competencia_ieb (1

Agreements decisions of association of undertakings and concerted practices – xiii_curso_de_derecho_de_l

BTW: Iberia is amongst the least professional and reliable airlines. My flight, which was supposed to leave Madrid yesterday at 7.15 pm, eventually left at 3.15 am. I arrived at home this morning around 7.00 am…. This is not the first time I have problems with this company. I filed a formal complaint. Let’s see how things turn out.

(image possibly subject to copyrights: see here)

Written by Nicolas Petit

18 January 2010 at 3:40 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Dissertation Summaries (14) – LLM in IP and Competition Law 2009-2010

leave a comment »

The Strategic Use of EU Competition Law: Typology and Assessment  Anne-Sophie Come (annesophie.come@gmail.com)

Legal affairs are no longer a “support” function for business entities. Firms increasingly rely on legal rules, proceedings and remedies, as strategic, profit maximising, levers. As a result of this evolution, firms increasingly seek to use (some say “instrumentalize”) the legal system in order to gain competitive advantages over/inflict competitive disadvantages to their rivals. In this context, it is the purpose of this dissertation to review the extent to which firms seek to use, and have used, EU competition law for strategic business reasons alien to the mere eradication of anticompetitive conduct in the market place. To this end, it provides a new reading of a number of well-known cases  decided by the Commission and the Court of Justice.

Written by Nicolas Petit

12 January 2010 at 8:48 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Dissertation Summaries (13) – LLM in IP and Competition Law 2009-2010

leave a comment »

Merger control in the air transport sector – A. Lackner (audrey.lackner@gmail.com)
The air transport sector exhibits a variety of particularities which distinguish it from other sectors: scale effects, important barriers to entry, ongoing liberalization, increased industry consolidation, critical input dependence (in particular, fuel prices), pervasive cooperative networks (strategic alliances), commercial innovation (emergence of low costs business models), sensitiveness to external shocks (terrorist attacks and natural disasters, etc.), etc. The purpose of the present dissertation is to determine to what extent the Commission’s merger control policy as regards air transport services follows a sector-specific approach and, if so, whether this is justified or not. To this end, the present dissertation reviews, in turn, the following issues: (i) market definition; (ii) theories of harm in horizontal, vertical and conglomeral air transport mergers; (iii) efficiencies; and (iv) remedies. It places a specific emphasis on the latest Commission decisions adopted in 2009.

Written by Nicolas Petit

11 January 2010 at 5:28 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Dissertation Summaries (12) – LLM in IP and Competition Law 2009-2010

leave a comment »

“Guilty but not Liable”: Action for damages against the European Commission following the Schneider and Mytravel Cases – Pierre Pirard (Pierre.Pirard@student.ulg.ac.be)
This dissertation aims at assessing the legal framework and effectiveness of the action for damages against the European Commission in the field of competition law. The present dissertation focuses in particular on several issues which are still in a state of uncertainty following the Schneider and MyTravel rulings, e.g., the principles governing the quantification of damages. It also draws comparisons from other areas of EU law, where the issue is governed by a larger body of case-law.

Written by Nicolas Petit

8 January 2010 at 1:12 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Dissertation Summaries (11) – LLM in IP and Competition Law 2009-2010

leave a comment »

An Analysis of the Decision of the Commission of 12 may 2009 concerning RFID and Data Protection – Laurie Caucheteux (Laurie.Caucheteux@student.ulg.ac.be)

The promising RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) technology – also known as the “Internet of things” – generates challenges for the protection of privacy and personal information in allowing the collection of data which may be connected, directly or indirectly, to natural persons. To alleviate those concerns, the European Commission adopted on 12 May 2009 a Recommendation concerning RFID and data protection.
The purpose of the present dissertation is to provide a first assessment of the legal framework applicable to RFID. It questions, amongst others, whether the choice of a mere Recommendation, as opposed to a stronger regulatory instrument, is appropriate. It also seeks to determine whether the recommendation addresses exhaustively the very many areas of concerns identified by the stakeholders.
To this end, this dissertation is divided into three parts. Part I comes back on the process which led to the adoption of the recommendation and clarifies the views and concerns expressed at this stage. Par II offers an analysis of the current regulatory framework, which spans the Recommendation as well as various directives and other relevant principles. Finally, Part III provides a personal, critical, assessment of the Recommendation.

Written by Nicolas Petit

7 January 2010 at 2:43 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Dissertation Summaries (10) – LLM in IP and Competition Law 2009-2010

leave a comment »

Green Technology Licenses: Strategies and Practices – Uliana Sylvia (S.Uliana@student.ulg.ac.be)

Developing countries have traditionally claimed that the strong intellectual property rights covering (green) technologies in developed countries prevented the implementation of environmental friendly standards to their domestic productions. The debate on this issue has recently been rejuvenated by the Copenhagen conference, and it is now increasingly admitted that developing countries urgently need access to climate change technologies (e.g., technology for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, renewable energy sources …). The purpose of this dissertation is to review which IPRs strategies (roundtables, negotiations, etc.) are likely to promote voluntary technology transfer, development and innovation collaboration in climate change technology between developed and developing countries. In this context, it focuses on identifying concrete, practical, measures which may support climate change technology cooperation between developed and developing countries.

Written by Nicolas Petit

6 January 2010 at 10:03 am

Posted in Uncategorized