Testing your competition knowledge
Who said that the dual, bifurcated structure of Article 101 was the “original sin” of EU competition law?
Chillin'Competition
Relaxing whilst doing Competition Law is not an Oxymoron
Authors’ Official (and unofficial) Bios
Events and publications
Blog Stats
- 3,184,398 hits
Recent Comments
 | Luc Peeperkorn on What Lukoil means for the refu… |
 | Rofiat Popoola on On reading and writing: lookin… |
 | Tero on What Lukoil means for the refu… |
 | Emanuela Lecchi on Upcoming events: Luxembourg (L… |
| Dolapo Popoola on Ranking the rankings |
Competition Tweets
Tweets by LamadridAlfonsoBrussels School of Competition
Join 3,837 other subscribers
Categories
- Antitrust Scholarship
- Archive
- Breaking – Antitrust – News
- Case-Law
- China Watch
- Events
- Everything Competition Lawyers should know about State Aids
- Guest bloggers
- Interesting Links
- International Antitrust
- Jokes
- Life at Law Firms
- Life at University
- Our Organizations
- Our Publications
- Polls and quizzes
- The Economist Corner
- The Friday Slot
- Uncategorized
Blogroll
- Antitrust and Competition Policy Blog
- Antitrust Commentary
- Antitrust Review
- Australian Competition Law
- CCP Blog
- Competition Law Blog
- Competition Law: a view from Hungary
- Energy Policy Blog
- Facebook – Become Fan of LLM in Competition and IP Law
- Global Competition Law Centre (GCLC)
- Global Competition Policy (GCP)
- Institute for European Legal Studies
- Institute of Competition Law (Concurrences)
- IP and Competition Law Blog (Canada)
- Kartellblog (German)
- La Libre Competencia
- Performance Juridique
- SSRN
- The European Telecommunications Law Blog
- The IPKat
- Truth on the market
- V. Selinsky's blog (French)
Archives
Visitors Location
Chillin'Competition 
Barry Hawk … 🙂
Anna
7 September 2010 at 5:42 pm
Wasn’t it the guy whose name is name is misspelled half the time in citations to his work? (Wish?) For me the original sin was Parker v Brown, but let’s not go there.
Mel
7 September 2010 at 8:09 pm