Chillin'Competition

Relaxing whilst doing Competition Law is not an Oxymoron

An intellectual somersault??

with 3 comments

While reading last Friday an article written in a Spanish newspaper by Jesús Alfaro (who, by the way, has sometimes made comments on this blog), I came accross a reference to a Wall Street Journal piece that looked interesting.  I checked it and thought that it illustrates pretty well the way in which EU competition law is perceived by many in the US.  Check out this excerpt:

“So if you, as an executive, were to be so foolish as to ask your in-house counsel whether a particular action might run afoul of the EU’s increasingly complex and draconian competition regulations, both your question and your lawyer’s answer would become potential evidence against you.

Yet in the sort of intellectual somersault for which European competition law has become notorious, the Court declared that its ruling would not undermine businesses’ rights of defense. That’s because, according to the Court, “the rights of the defence is a fundamental principle of European Union law,” enshrined both in case law and in the Charter of Fundamental Right of the European Union.”

Aside from the fact that the second paragraph does not make much sense, the article reveals a misconception of EU competition law that I´ve observed many times in the recent past, particulalry on the other side of the pond. Antitrust/competition law is admittedly an area where legal certainty is sometimes the exception rather than the norm. However, are there really any reasons why EU competition law could be considered more of an”intellectual somersault” than its US counterpart?  I truly don´t see them.

Written by Alfonso Lamadrid

15 November 2010 at 7:11 am

Posted in Guest bloggers

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Alfonso, do you still think
    are there really any reasons why EU competition law could be considered more of an”intellectual somersault” than its US counterpart? I truly don´t see them.

    after the 2011-01-20 General Química and Others v Commission judgment?

    jesus alfaro

    20 January 2011 at 7:41 pm

    • Hola Jesús: As I said (quoting an article that, btw, I found thanks to your very good article on the press), I don´t think that EU competition law is more of an intellectual sommersault than US antitrust law.

      I could agree on the fact that both perhaps are something of a sommersault if compared to other areas of law. However, I find it hard to accept the contention (often made by some in the US) that EU competition law is difficult to make sense of.

      The General Química Judgment has not altered my views on that. In fact, I don´t see that one as debatable as others. I would love to know your views on it..

      Alfonso Lamadrid

      24 January 2011 at 7:55 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: