Relaxing whilst doing Competition Law is not an Oxymoron

Single and continuous infringement

with one comment

Before this blog is flooded with the zeitgeist debates on the Post Denmark II Judgment issued this morning (the good news for Pablo is that all his previous posts on the subject remain valid…), here are the slides (in Spanish, sorry) that I used this morning for my intervention at the Spanish Competition Authority, as announced in my previous post:

Infracción única y continuada- Alfonso Lamadrid

(Many thanks to Paloma Lantero for the help in preparing them)

Written by Alfonso Lamadrid

6 October 2015 at 12:47 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Let me start the flood my good friend :). The culture of cutting the baby in half it is. I find some interesting things in it. The more econ approach is no walking dead. We have effects language all over the judgment, efficiency defense confirmed, no principled ruling out of AEC test (a tool), theory of anticompetitive leveraging of non contestable to contestable share is there, and recognition that objective capacity is likelihood-charged. Sure, de minimis gets definitely rejected, but at the same time, Court says that the market coverage of the practice ” constitute a useful indication as to the extent of that practice and its impact on the market”. Auspicious.

    Nicolas Petit

    6 October 2015 at 2:10 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: