Chillin'Competition

Relaxing whilst doing Competition Law is not an Oxymoron

Word of warning

with 4 comments

Today, the distance between Google and a competition law infringement has drastically narrowed down.

In a formal opinion (not a decision), the French NCA declared that Google occupies a dominant position on the search advertisement market. To tell the truth, this is far from surprising. Yet, this will certainly be bad news for Google, which has been willing to observe a low PR profile until recently.

Now, what’s more interesting is that the French NCA purports in its report to provide ex ante guidelines (“grille de lecture“, §297) on those of Google’s practices which may be deemed abusive under the competition rules. A good illustration of soft, indirect enforcement on the basis of consultative opinions.

Here are the possible abuses according to the French NCA :

  • Elevation of barriers to entry on search and search advertisement markets (through content exclusivity, technical barriers, etc.)
  • Leveraging of market position on search and search advertisement markets (through ranking manipulation, etc.)
  • Unlawful discrimination in relation to the Adwords service
  • Unbalanced revenue sharing mechanism in relation to the Adsense service

The French NCA further notes that competition law is the body of rules which should be solicited to allay concerns on those markets. In contrast, sector specific legislation is not needed.

Interestingly, the power of the French NCA to issue such opinions does not fall within the scope of the Commission’s monitoring powers under Regulation 1/2003. In other words, the Commission cannot influence the substantive conclusions of the French NCA under this procedure.

I plan to read the full opinion tomorrow. We’ll be posting on this regularly in the coming weeks.

Written by Nicolas Petit

14 December 2010 at 6:41 pm

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. It sounds like the market study prerogative that UK NCAs have. Haven’t read it, but from the press coverage seems like they went as far as market definition and dominance, but didn’t manage to go all the way through to a finding of abuse.
    So I respectfully disagree with your topline, in that I think that the distance between Google and comp. law infringement has definitely not being drastically narrowed down.

    Paolo

    15 December 2010 at 11:46 am

    • Paolo, you should read the full report, it is of utmost interest in relation to abuse.

      Nicolas Petit

      19 December 2010 at 3:38 pm

      • If only I could read French…

        Paolo

        22 December 2010 at 5:56 pm

  2. […] the “Google front”, the Conseil de la Concurrence issued the formal opinion commented here; the Commission took over the investigation of two additional complaints that been lodged before […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: